Written by Abram Demski
last updated

The VNM theorem is one of the classic results of Bayesian decision theory. It establishes that, under four assumptions known as the VNM axioms, a preference relation must be representable by maximum-expectation decision making over some real-valued utility function. (In other words, rational decision making is best-average-case decision making.)

Starting with some set of outcomes, gambles (or lotteries) are defined recursively. An outcome is a gamble, and for any finite set of gambles, a probability distribution over those gambles is a gamble.

Preferences are then expressed over gambles via a preference relation. if  is preferred to , this is written . We also have indifference, written . If  is either preferred to  or indifferent with , this can be written .

The four VNM axioms are:

  1. Completeness. For any gambles  and , either , or .
  2. Transitivity. If  and , then .
  3. Continuity. If , then there exists a probability  such that  . In other words, there is a probability which hits any point between two gambles.
  4. Independence. For any  and , we have  if and only if . In other words, substituting  for  in any gamble can't make that gamble worth less.

In contrast to Utility Functions, this tag focuses specifically on posts which discuss the VNM theorem itself.